Tuesday, December 30, 2008

Democratic Party Hypocrisy on Iraq...through the years

This video sums up the absolute hypocrisy of the Democratic Party and their recent stance on Iraq.

Monday, December 22, 2008

5 Myths About the Bush Record Liberals Wanted you to Believe

While the New York Times, Huffington Post, and the "Obamanation" have been telling Americans that President George W. Bush has been a tragedy, the reality and facts show something quite the opposite.

Ed Gillespie over at Real Clear Politics has a story that may surprise not only liberals and Democrats, but even some Republicans. When the facts are put up on stage and looked at honestly, George W. has been a pretty successful President considering what he has had to work with; and he could have been even more successful had Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, and their goon squad had listened to Mr. Bush. As I always say...go figure.

This article is a must read.

Friday, December 19, 2008

Congress gets pay raise

Now I don't have a problem with anybody who works for a living receiving a yearly raise; that's what hard work is about right?

But I do have an issue when the people receiving a raise- Congress- are filled with people, particularly on the left, who expect those in the corporate world to give up their raises.

“As lawmakers make a big show of forcing auto executives to accept just $1 a year in salary, they are quietly raiding the vault for their own personal gain,” said Daniel O’Connell, chairman of The Senior Citizens League (TSCL), a non-partisan group.

Wednesday, December 17, 2008

Barrak's middle name is now hip...

Before the election day 2008, anyone who included Barack Obama's middle name, Hussein, would be hissed at by Democrats, leftwingers, and most of the media. Apparently there was a memo given out, that conservatives didn't get that banned the public from using Mr. Obama's full name.

Now that Barack Obama is elected to be the next president, he plans on showing off his middle name like its a brand new pair of shoes. If I were Muslim I might be a bit offended by Obama and his loyal followers and protectors who got their panties all up in a bunch every time someone, God forbid, used his middle name.

From a Muslim point of view, it would seem that Barack Obama was ashamed of the name Hussein. By the left's reaction to using Barack's middle name, Hussein, one would think that that name was a curse word. But not anymore.

(Yahoo News- "President-elect Barack Obama says he will try to "reboot America's image" among the world's Muslims and will follow tradition by using his entire name — Barack Hussein Obama — in his swearing-in ceremony."

So Barack Obama believes that by using his Muslim given middle name, he will somehow bring Muslims, Jews, and Christians together? The people he is trying to impress would like to see the destruction of Israel, and the western world as a whole. These Islamofascists hate America, not because Obama hasn't been using his middle name (if it was only so simple).

The people Obama is trying to impress hate America because we allow woman equal rights, allow gay people to live (and not hang them in the square), allow free speech, free press, and allow Christians, Jews, and Muslims to worship freely in the same country. Until America is wiped off the map, along with Isreal, these Muslims Obama is trying to impress will never view our country with respect.

Sunday, December 14, 2008

Obama Snubs Black Media...

African-American newspapers and media outlets are beginning to get the big picture- Democrats (Barack Obama included) use and exploit African-American issues to get the black vote (something the National Black Republican Association has known for a long time).

Black Agenda Report, Issue for Dec 10 - Dec 16, 2008)
"Black publishers say they have been locked out of Obama's advertising game plan - and even shunned in their attempts to cover the Obama operation. The Illinois Senator's handlers - and maybe the man himself - "think that we as black people are so anxious to get a black president that we'll support him no matter what," said one editor. "So why waste money on us?"

Saturday, December 13, 2008

Further Proof - The World Craves Freedom

Immigration to the US, 1820-2007 v2 from Ian S on Vimeo.
The above animation is an amazing visual display of how the world truly craves freedom; a specific brand of freedom that only the United States of America has offered. The numbers speak for themselves...

During the past several years we heard liberals, most Democrats, say that the rest of the world didn't have a favorable view of the United States- that we were bullies, etc. Of course no other country in the world has given so much of itself, risked life and limb, to help bring aid, safety, and freedom to those in need in the world. When a country country has come to the U.S. asking for help- we're there.

The United States on 9-11-01 comes under attack, what was the result? The Taliban loses its heavy grip on Afghanistan- they have elections in fact. Iraq, and the world, has one of the most viscous dictators taken off the map, and off the earth- though this didn't have as much to do with 9/11 as much as years of Saddam Hussein "playing" the weapons inspectors. But was there atrocities such as genocide? Yes. How could we look the other way for another 8 years? We didn't. Now when U.S. soldiers walk through the streets of Baghdad, as well as many other towns, they are not greeted as a threat, but as friends, as saviors. But Democrats would not want us to know that- that would not have helped the "holy one" Barack Obama become elected.

A fact that falls by the wayside for many, George W. Bush has done more to help Africa with A.I.D.S. epidemic than any other U.S. President- a fact that even Barack Obama admits. The much despised George W. Bush in his own country is considered a hero in many African nations. Go figure.

So what is the point of this whole article? No other country in the world has such an "immigration issue" as does the U.S. People risk their lives to have an opportunity to step on American soil, to experience real freedom. People are not building rafts made of sticks to ride through the dangerous shark infested waters of the carribean to make it to the shores of Cuba or Haiti. People don't risk their lives, enduring suffocation, while they ride in a trunk, or cargo, hoping to be "shipped" into the U.S. making it past Customs.

Many other countries, in Europe for example, don't have the opportunities that immigrants have in the U.S. But watching the NBC, CNN, or CBS nightly news, one would think that the United States is a horrible place- mean spirited, hateful toward anything that isn't American. Yet, more and more people, by the thousands, still risk lives to be American. It all comes down to one word- FREEDOM. The world craves freedom.

Friday, December 5, 2008

The E.P.A. and their "Fart Tax"

A story that could be in a Saturday Night Live skit, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has proposed a fee for farmers who have cows, hogs, due to their flatulence. In other words a "Fart Tax".

In the United States, we recycle our cans, bottles, paper, cardboard boxes; we even recycle items that are recycled. The U.S. is more environmentally friendly then most nations in the world. Barack Obama thinks we should be more like China, but based on their deplorable air pollution, the EPA should have scolded Obama for making such a comment. America is cleaner then it ever has been since the industrial revolution- but the EPA and their "green" obsessed army will never be satisfied until we are passing gas into jars and taking them to "fart depositories".

Here is what the EPA has proposed:

Farms or ranches with 25 dairy cows, 50 beef cattle or 200 hogswould pay an annual fee:
  • $175 for each dairy cow
  • $87.50 per head of beef cattle
  • $20 for each hog.
Based on the above numbers, a farm with 25 cows, 50 beef cattle and 200 hogs would have to pay $12,750. I grew up in a farming community, and having 25 dairy cows is not considered a large farm. For the farms that have hundreds of cows, cattle, or hogs, jobs will be lost to make up for this cost.

But this is the type of "Change" the Obama Nation have been talking about. When their Mocha Latte cost them a few dollars more at Starbucks the liberal elitists can thank their wonderful EPA and their wonderful "Fart Tax".

Thursday, December 4, 2008

The Russians are coming! The Russians are coming!

For the first time since WWII, the Russian navy announced that it would be sailing the warship destroyer, Admiral Chabanenko, through the Panama Canal this week. The Russians announced Wednesday that they would be pushing ahead with this symbolic "projection of Moscow's power in a traditional U.S. zone of influence".

And now we have a President Elect, Barack Obama, who said he was going to cut our defense spending...while the other guys are amping up theirs...God help us. Here's exactly what Obama said...

"I will cut investments in unproven missile defense systems.

I will not weaponize space. I will slow our development of future combat systems.

And I will institute an independent defense priorities board to ensure that the Quadrennial Defense Review is not used to justify unnecessary spending.

Third, I will set a goal of a world without nuclear weapons. To seek that goal, I will not develop new nuclear weapons, I will seek a ban on the production of fissile material,

and I will negotiate with Russia to take our ICBM's off hair-trigger alert and to achieve deep cuts in our nuclear arsenal"

Wednesday, December 3, 2008

Gay is the new Bigot

I would love to see these people hold up these signs in front of an African American church rather then wimping out and protesting in front of Mormon and predominantly white churches that they know will not fight back...They say that "Gay is the new black", but lately it seems that "Gay is the new BIGOT"!

Tuesday, December 2, 2008

Depression? Not even close...

Smiling faces, waiting to spend money on "Black Friday"

During the 2008 Presidential campaign words like recession and depression were thrown around, and used to get an emotional response out of voters. Before the election Barack Obama even compared the present situation to the Great Depression saying, "There are some similarities, though, to what happened back in the late 20s and early 30s and what's been happening now, and the biggest similarity is how we've been dealing with Wall Street and what's happening in the financial markets."(5/14/08, Reuters)

Barack Obama even displayed several families on his one hour media buyout special. These families were supposodly hit hard in these times, though a few of them seemed to be eating rather well- no sarcasm intended. During the election I took note of the packed shopping center parking lots, lines of people purchasing the newest iPhones, Wii game station, or big screen tvs. These were not rich people, but middle income and even, dare I say, low income families.

During the Great Depression families of five, six, and more, lived in small one bedroom apartments- and that was living high. People waited in lines for half a day or more just to get a loaf of bread and some milk. Cardboard box "towns" called hoovervilles were a common site in cities across the nation.

But on the biggest shopping day of the year, Black Friday as they call it, most people were not spending the day waiting in line for a loaf of bread, but rushing, literally, like herds of cattle, into shopping centers across the country- to spend money on so-called basic needs such as Nintendo games, HDTVs, cell phones, dvds, and everything in between. Are we even close to a depression? Not even in the same galaxy...

Thursday, November 27, 2008

Thanksgiving 2009?

Hopefully this won't be served at the White House during the Obama years...

Wednesday, November 26, 2008

Obama now agrees with Bush on Defense?

After years of bashing the Bush Administration for its handling of its use of military and national defense, President-Elect Barack Obama has decided to keep Republican Robert Gates on as Secretary of Defense from the Bush Administration.

This brings up many questions, primarily because of Barack Obama's stance on the Iraq war, and the fact that he has picked Gates, the man who is in charge of the war at this point in time. Obama campaigned on change, and with a large number of "Team Clinton" returning to serve with Obama, as well as a Bush Administration in the top position for national defense, some may ask, where's the change?

Like a deer in headlights, Obama may be doing what anyone with little to no experience in a given position would do; surround yourself with people who have the experience and get on for the ride. But why would Obama decide to keep on Robert Gates in the Secretary of Defense postion?

After being elected into office Barack Obama was probably briefed on some realities of what the United States is dealing with related to national defense. And after learning what is really going on, rather then what the media thinks is going on, he may have come to the realization that the best man is in the position right now- Robert Gates. Obama may have even come to the conclusion, based on being briefed, that the Bush Administration did indeed have legitimate cause for some of the decisions they made in relation to national defense. Playing "Monday morning quarterback" on the campaign trail is a whole lot different then being Commander in Chief.

So the question many conservatives have is this: are his supporters and the Obama-loving media going to give him a free ride on this decision? It was Barack Obama who told us that John McCain was going to be Bush continued. But it appears that the Obama Administration is going to be Clinton/Bush continued...

Saturday, November 22, 2008

Clinton Administration: Part Deux

What does Rahm Emanuel, Hillary Clinton, Eric Holder, Janet Napolitano ,and Greg Craig have in common? If being new members of the future Obama Administration is your answer, your only part correct. They also worked in the Clinton Administration. Barack Obama campaigned on the idea of "change", but he is surrounding himself by the same old Washington, D.C. crowd.

The most least experienced, and arguably un-qualified President elect in history, Barack Obama may have no choice but rely on the same old characters to guide him through the next four years. Change, change, change...well, it looked good on the posters and bumper stickers.

Tuesday, November 18, 2008

Survey: Obama Voters Lack Knowledge of Their Candidate

Like the majority of voters who didn't cast their vote for Barack Obama on election day, I found it difficult to believe such a large number of people could vote for someone with the lack of experience and the philosophies he apparently shared based on his past relationships.

Sure, there are always going to be those Democrats that will vote the party lines no matter who is running. And I realize that there are those on the far left that agree with many of Barack Obama's past Marxist/Socialist philosophies- many of them being anti-semetic and racist (you don't spend twenty-plus years in a church that preaches a Marxist brand of Black Theology with an anti-semetic/anti-white philosophy and not have some agreement).

So I came to believe that the majority of voters who did not fall into the far left wing category must have been ignorant to most of Obama's background due to the media outlets they were watching. The proof to my conclusion was coming across people who actually believed that "Joe the Plumber" was an imaginery friend of John McCain, rather then, a guy who was minding his own business until Barack Obama and his entourage landed in his neighborhood- and asked one of the most sensible questions of the campaign; one that the mainstream media failed to ask Obama.

These same voters who I came across also had little to no knowledge of who and what Bill Ayers, the admitted and unrepentant Weather Underground terrorist, was. These people had heard the name Tony Rezko and Rev. Wright, but I had to remind them that one, Wright, was a racist preacher who preached hateful, anti-American sermons at the Obama's church for the past 20 years and that Rezko was one of Obama's closest friends, fundraiser, and business partner- and is serving prison time.

My theory, that most of these voters got their news from outlets that did more to serve the Obama campaign then to report the facts, may be backed up by a recent Zogby survey. The 12 question survey commissioned by John Ziegler asked Obama voters questions related to Obama/Biden and McCain/Palin. Only 2% of these Obama voters could answer all the questions related to Obama correctly.

The survey essentially shows that the majority of Obama voters were embarrassingly knowledgeable about really important issues related their candidate. In a time in history where there are more news outlets then one could ever keep up with, people still did not get what they were supposed to- the truth. This past election cycle should be a big black mark on the "report card" of journalism.

This is not to say there were not some news outlets, journalists, etc., that did a fantastic job giving equal and in-depth reporting on the two candidates. But unfortunately some of these same journalists and/or news outlets were the ones that were practically "blacklisted" by the majority of the media as well as the Democratic nominees, including Obama and his "henchmen". We even witnessed the Obama campaign threaten to ban local news stations from their campaign after asking "the wrong" questions- kind of like "Joe the Plumber".

Here are a few interesting questions and percentages- very sad, but not surprising...

  • Only 11.6% of Obama voters knew Obama said his policies "would likely bankrupt the coal industry and make energy rates skyrocket."

  • Only 43.9% of Obama voters knew Obama began his political career at the home of "two former members of the Weather Underground".

  • Only 17.4% of Obama voters knew that Obama "won their first election by getting all their opponents kicked off the ballot".

These same voters seem to know a whole lot about Sarah Palin...

  • 86% of Obama voters knew that Palin "wore clothes that their political party reportedly spent $150,000 on".

  • 93.8% of Obama voters knew that Palin "currently has a pregnant teenage daughter".
To show how the media has truly blurred the news and fiction, this next question referred to a quote made by Saturday Night Live's Tina Fey immitating Sarah Palin. This quote about "seeing Russia" from her house was not made by Sarah Palin. But apparently these voters can't tell between reality and fiction- go figure.

86.9% of Obama voters said that Palin said she "could see Russia" from her house.

View Entire Survey Results: http://www.zogby.com/news/wf-dfs.pdf
Also visit: http://howobamagotelected.com

Saturday, November 15, 2008

Condemned to Repeat the Past?

"Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it."
-George Santayana, 1905

Never has the above quote been more applicable to our society than today. It is hard to believe that millions upon millions of new voters who came out to support Barack Obama on election day in 2008 were not even alive to witness President Ronald Reagan give the historic 1987 speech at the Brandenburg Gate in West Berlin, Germany. It was there, at the wall, where he spoke to a divided Germany, "Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!". (full speech text)

While he was speaking to a crowd in West Berlin, his voice was audible to those gathered on the other side of the Berlin Wall; on the Communist ruled side. Those who were living under Communist rule on the other side of that wall were hungry for freedom; the freedom of expression, freedom to choose one's destination in life. To not settle for less, but to strive for endless opportunities- the idea that working hard could mean achieving greatness. The world had witnessed the decay, both physically and spiritually, caused by Communism and the dictators who carried the "hammer and sickle".

Today, young people at universities across the United States, either did not witness, or remember why the words of President Ronald Reagan rang so true at that time of history. Many professors have given a false face to communism and socialism, even making it seem desirable. Yet those who bathe in the mire of Marxism always become defensive when their true philosophies are exposed. The question to be asked is, if this ideology is such a positive thing, why not proudly campaign on an honest Marxist platform? The truth is, human beings desire to be free, and individual freedom does not work in the mechanics of Marxism/Communism.

So, with that said, history may be repeating itself, only because there are those who are willing to forget, or turn their heads from history. A Russian navy fleet is making its way to the Carribean to hold joint military exercises with Venezuelan forces while Russian President Medvedev plans a trip this month to Cuba and Venezuela.

In a time where America needs a strong, militarily sound, unwavering leader, the majority of voters elected the most unqualified, least experienced man to be Commander in Chief. This makes some wonder if the powerhouses in the world feel like they might have "one up" on the United States starting in late January.

Wednesday, November 12, 2008

Russia, Iran vs.The Community Organizer

Iran tested a missile that can go the distance- and Israel is within that range.

On Wednesday, the Kremlin has rejected a U.S. proposal for a missile defense system in Europe.

"Russian President Dmitry Medvedev said last week he planned to deploy missile systems near Poland's border in retaliation for U.S. plans to install elements of the proposed missile defense system in Poland and the Czech Republic."

And now the big question is: How is a Chicago "community organizer", junior Senator, with no executive experience and past anti-war/Marxist philosophies going to stand up to the "big boys" of the world?

God help us.

Tuesday, November 11, 2008

Thank you, Veterans

Thank you, to all those who have served, and are serving our country. Both of my grandfather's served our country. I honor them here, along with the millions of other men and woman who have served, lost life and limb, in duty to this great country.

Monday, November 10, 2008

Left Wing Hate Alert

Sometimes the left wing hate machine does the job for us...that is, expose their true intent.

Remember those high gas price...they may be back...

According to President Elect Barack Obama's transition chief, John Podesta, we may witness our next President use his "executive order" power soon after being sworn in.

The majority of Americans supported George W. Bush in his lifting of the ban on offshore drilling. It seems that there may be plans to put that ban back in place under an Obama Administration. George W. Bush lifted the ban, prices began to come down. If Barack Obama does what his transition chief John Podesta says, be prepared to pay higher gas prices.

But this falls in line with the Obama kind of change. If we go back in time, he did say that he would have preferred a "gradual adjustment". Here is a video of that moment...

Saturday, November 8, 2008

Washington Post admits un-balanced...after the fact.

The 2008 election cycle will be historic for many reasons, both postive and...well, not so positive. The media bias in favor of Barack Obama, not just in his battle against Republican John McCain, but even against Democratic contender Hillary Clinton in the primaries.

This bias became so obvious, even those on the left within the media began to voice their discomfort over the lack of journalistic integrity.

Many conservative and independent talk show hosts predicted that we would start to find out more about Barack Obama's past after the election. It hasn't been a week since Obama was elected before one of the largest, and left leaning, newspapers have had a writer come out and admit to this obvious observation.

Washington Post writer Deborah Howell writes...

"...readers have been consistently critical of the lack of probing issues coverage and what they saw as a tilt toward Democrat Barack Obama. My surveys, which ended on Election Day, show that they are right on both counts."

Friday, November 7, 2008

Historic Election Week in More Then One Way

Wall St. has worst post election week in history...

While Barack Obama's election to the United States' highest office was a historic landmark, it appears that another historic moment was had: Wall St. had the worst week of a presidential election. But the big question on the minds of many is...Why?

U.S. stocks in presidential election weeks
NEW YORK, Nov 7 (Reuters)

The following table shows the percentage rise or decline in the
Dow Jones industrial average, Standard & Poor's 500 index and Nasdaq
composite index in the last three days of the week of a U.S
presidential election, as well as who won the Election Day vote.
Year Dow S&P Nasdaq President elect
2008 -7.08 -7.43 -7.46 Barack Obama
2004 +3.51 +3.15 +2.73 George W. Bush
2000 -3.19 -4.60 -11.32 No decision: G.W. Bush v Al Gore*
1996 +2.28 +2.34 +2.31 William Clinton
1992 -0.38 -0.56 +2.02 William Clinton
1988 -2.84 -2.63 -1.34 George H. W. Bush
1984 -2.02 -1.65 -0.42 Ronald Reagan
1980 -0.51 +0.11 +0.19 Ronald Reagan
1976 -2.38 -2.21 -1.02 James Carter
1972 +1.06 -0.22 -0.34 Richard Nixon
1968 +1.35 +0.82 --- Richard Nixon
1964 +0.16 +0.06 --- Lyndon Johnson
1960 +1.84 +1.38 --- John Kennedy
1956 -2.02 -2.65 --- Dwight Eisenhower
1952 +1.20 +0.73 --- Dwight Eisenhower
1948 -6.00 -7.16 --- Harry Truman
1944 +0.11 +0.31 --- Franklin Roosevelt
1940 +1.06 +0.81 --- Franklin Roosevelt
1936 +2.79 +1.40 --- Franklin Roosevelt
1932 +5.34 +8.02 --- Franklin Roosevelt
1928 +2.13 +1.99 --- Herbert Hoover
1924 +0.93 --- --- Calvin Coolidge
1920 -2.34 --- --- Warren Harding
1916 +0.41 --- --- Woodrow Wilson
1912 +1.13 --- --- Woodrow Wilson
1908 +5.28 --- --- William Taft
1904 +2.75 --- --- Theodore Roosevelt
1900 +7.03 --- --- William McKinley
1896 +5.86 --- --- William McKinley

Punishment for Lieberman

Apparently Harry Reid and his fellow Democrats use "punishment" as a way of getting back at their peers when they choose to think for themselves, rather then with Democrats. I wonder if Reid would accept punishment for Republicans that supported Obama? Hmmmm...

"WASHINGTON (AP)...Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada, angered by Lieberman's support of Republican John McCain for president, is considering yanking Lieberman's chairmanship of the Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee as punishment."

Thursday, November 6, 2008

Market's Worst Two-Day Slump Since 1987...

The media isn't talking about it, but could it be because a guy name Barack Hussein Obama was elected to be the next President of the United States?

Obama not taking own advice?

"Let's resist the temptation to fall back on the same partisanship and pettiness and immaturity that has poisoned our politics for so long." - Barack Obama Election Day 2008

He has since announced that Rahm Emanuel will be his Chief of Staff. Let's look back on a quote from the man they call "Rahm-bo"...

"F#@k the Republicans."- Rahm Emmanuel

Looks like Obama is off to a good start resisting "the temptation to fall back on the same partisanship and pettiness and immaturity that has poisoned our politics for so long."


Tuesday, November 4, 2008



Saturday, November 1, 2008

McCain could creat 1,210,046 more jobs then Obama

According to a Heritage Foundation Center for Data Analysis report, John McCain's tax plan would create substantially more jobs then Barack Obama's.

According to a Heritage Foundation Center for Data Analysis report, John McCain's tax plan would create substantially more jobs then Barack Obama's.

Friday, October 31, 2008

Liberal Thuggery in San Francisco?

We have witnessed a pattern of rude, mean spirited, and out right distasteful behavior this past election cycle. From the Sarah Palin hating celebrities making statements like comedian Sandra Bernhard saying that the Republican V.P. nominee would be "gang-raped by my big black brothers" if she enters Manhattan. There has been several John McCain offices that have been vandalized in Pittsburgh, South Carolina, and one office had its volunteers maced by Obama supporters- in the office! Obama did tell his supporters, "I want you to argue with them and get in their face". It appears they are doing that and more.

We can tell a lot about people by the way they treat their own family members. In San Francisco, anti-war activist Cindy Sheehan is running against Nancy Pelosi for her congressional position. Sheehan has been a long time critic of Pelosi and her position on the war (I guess she wasn't against the war enough?). People like Nancy Pelosi are not used to having people protest against them because usually they have the protestors on their side. But Sheehan and her gang of protesters were a real thorn in Pelosi's side. Now Sheehan is running for her job! Apparently there are some people who are not too happy about this because Cindy Sheehan has been the victim of some "intimidation" tactics, the most recent was this past week, October 30, 2008. All the front windows of her campaign office were broken out and a computer was stolen.

Sheehan's campaign manager, Tiffany Burns says, "Each time we confront her (Pelosi), each time we ask her for a debate, each time we gain ground in the polls, something horrible happens," said Burns. "Once or twice might be a coincidence, but such a consistent correlation is hard to ignore."

Unreleased Obama Records

For a campaign and media that loves to look deep into the lives of average citizens like "Joe the Plumber", they don't seem too concerned with Obama's past. Aside from his obviously sketchy circle of friends and colleagues, his records are still a mystery. Maybe if Obama was a white, conservative, and/or Republican these records would be demanded by the media.

1. Occidental College records -- Not released
2. Columbia College records -- Not released
3. Columbia Thesis paper -- 'not available'
4. Harvard College records -- Not released
5. Selective Service Registration -- Not released
6. Medical records -- Not released (we have a "excellent health" letter from his doctor...yeah.)
7. Illinois State Senate schedule -- 'not available'
8. Law practice client list -- Not released
9. Certified Copy of original Birth certificate - - Not released
10. Embossed, signed paper Certification of Live Birth -- Not released
11. Harvard Law Review articles published -- None
12. University of Chicago scholarly articles -- None
13. Record of baptism-- Not released or 'not available'
14. Illinois State Senate records--'not available'

Wednesday, October 22, 2008

Obama and his Marxist Comrads

Recently we have witnessed Barack Obama and his campaign be on the defensive after John McCain called Obama's tax plan a socialist plan. But when we look at what makes up the man who is Barack Obama, we see a vast array of socialist and communist writers, community leaders, and even mentors, that Obama immersed himself in. In his book Dreams From My Father, Barack wrote, "I chose my friends carefully. The more politically active black students. The foreign students. The Chicanos. The Marxist professors and structural feminists and punk-rock performance poets.”

Frank Marshall Davis, a communist, and member of the Communist Party USA (CPUSA) was a childhood mentor to Obama. He even writes about him in Dreams From My Father, referring to him repeatedly as "Frank". So it would be natural for a college bound Obama to associate himself with the young socialists and Marxists on campus.

For someone who places their "community organizer" status so high, high enough that they use it as a reason to be President of the free world, we sure don't hear much about the details of the actual "organizing". While journalists were trying to track down a non-existent wrench to throw into Sarah Palin's "wheels", there is so much dirt in Chicago surrounding Barack Obama's "community organizing" days that one would only have to do an internet search or read up on some newspaper archives to find out the facts. But ignorance is bliss in the mainstream media when you are an Obama supporter. We are not hearing much about the details because the majority of the media knows what they will find, and it doesn't further their cause- an Obama presidency.

But it was in Chicago that Obama came in contact with some of the most left-wing political groups in our country. These groups were/are pushing for socialist programs cloaked in "community organizing". Here we find groups such as ACORN, Bill Ayers, and Carl Davidson. ACORN has a dismal record for voter registration fraud.

Bill Ayers is an unrepentant terrorist, and Weather Underground founder (and open Marxist). Ayers served with Obama on the Woods Fund of Chicago as well as the Annenberg Challenge. Bill Ayers also launched Obama's political career with a fundraiser in his own living room. Obama's argument is that he was a child when Ayers took part in these terrorist activities. But that is not the point. The point is that he would associate with someone who is still, in 2001 when they still had worked together, was unrepentant. But the bigger issue is this: Ayers has shown Obama great support, and vice versa. Does Obama share his views? If not, why would you spend that time of time and work with someone that far out? Based on that relation alone, Barack Obama wouldn't pass a security screen for many other high level government jobs. (Makes you wonder doesn't it?)

Carl Davidson is a figure in the Correspondence for Democracy and Socialism, which stems from the old Moscow controlled CPUSA. He helped organize the 2002 rally where Barack Obama came out against the Iraq War. Davidson is a member of the New Party, a Marxist political coalition. Obama sought out their endorsment for his Illinois senate seat in 1996- and he got it.

And then we have his church, where he attended for over twenty years. A church that preaches openly, Black Liberation Theology. His "spiritual mentor, as Obama referred to him, was the Rev. Jeremiah Wright. Wright preached socialist, Marxist/Maoist, and anti-Jew and anti-white sermons; hate speech. The question here again, why would Obama spend two decades with a man, and church who has such divisive, and racist views? To be baptized in, married in, and raise children in such an environment would tell of a man who agrees with this racist philosophy. It wasn't until the media outlets finally ran the story that Obama finally quit the church. Why now Obama? He obviously had no problem with those views the last two decades; very troubling indeed.

Barack Obama either has really bad judgement of who he surrounds himself with, or, he actually does think the same way as these people and groups. We probably can come to the conclusion that Obama was mentored by, worked with, and befriended these people because he does indeed share their philosophies. Remember that quote from Obama, "I chose my friends carefully"? It appears that he did continue on that path. But when he began running for President of the United States, he knew he would not be able to be elected if he openly campaigned as a Marxist or Socialist. He has learned well from the writings of Marxist activist Saul Alinsky who wrote the "bible for radicals", Rules for Radicals. Even Saul Alinsky's son remarked that "Obama learned his lesson well." One of those lessons was to "rub raw the sores of discontent", as Saul Alinsky put it. In other words, remind the people how angry they should be, even when they are not. Because when they are angry, Barack can be "the One" to come to their rescue (or that's what he tells them). That's what Obama did in Chicago, and that is what Obama is doing today.

So this brings us back to Barack Obama and his campaign acting surprised and offended that McCain and his supporters would insinuate that his policies were dripping with socialism. Where would we get that idea from(sarcasm)? Does Obama, his campaign, and the majority of the media think "We the People" are that dumb? Apparently they do. And it appears that Barack Obama has pulled the wool over the eyes of many. But we live in an age where information travels faster then ever. The media bigwigs don't have control over the world wide web, the bloggers, the e-mails- not yet. But that's another story ("Fairness Doctrine")....

Tuesday, October 21, 2008

Nickelodeon Poll picked Kerry in 2004!

Back in the 2004 Presidential Election, children's programming channel Nickelodeon released a poll results that had Democratic hopeful John Kerry winning the election over Republican George W. Bush. The results less then two weeks away from the election according to their online poll showed that 57% backed Kerry against 43% for Bush! In this article, released on October 21, 2004, it discusses how the "kids' vote seems to work as a good barometer of the actual presidential vote". Well, apparently the kids must have changed their mind at the time of the actual election because those numbers were not only wrong, but as we know now, Bush won the election.

So what does this have to do with the election in 2008? Well, Nickelodeon released the same poll between Obama and McCain. The numbers are a bit closer with Obama leading McCain 51% to 49%. According to the 2004 results, these numbers could translate to, McCain beating Obama, 56.7% to 42.3%! Interestingly enough, this really wouldn't be that far fetched. Take for instance, the margin of error, along with undecided voters, and you have an entirely different kind of election then the mainstream media has been presenting to us.

So with that said, this election is far from being wrapped up!

Thursday, October 16, 2008

Obama exploits tribal tension in Kenya- 1000 Dead

The picture to the left features Barack Obama with his cousin Raila Odinga. Odinga and Obama have roots in the same Kenyan Luo tribe. So who is this Kenyan who seems to be rather friendly with Barack Obama? He is the current Prime Minister of Kenya whose supporters are burning Christians alive as they are trapped in churches. The followers of Odinga are fanatical followers of radical Islamists who are pushing for Sharia Law. They want a total ban on all other religions, co-ed schools, and dressing in "western style" clothing. Odinga was educated in former Soviet controlled East Germany. He still aligns himself with his "educators" and is now allied with Islamists in order to gain control via their support.

It seems when Barack Obama visited Kenya on a "fact-finding" trip in 2006, he was carrying out part of a secret election strategy that also included exploiting divisive tribal tensions and ultimately taking advantage of rioting that left 1,000 dead. Read Story...

Wednesday, October 15, 2008

Obama, Ayers, and the Woods...

Barack Obama and his campaign have been brushing admitted terrorist, Bill Ayers, off his sleeves these past few weeks. One thing is true- Barack Obama likes to talk. He has an answer for everything, and he has a knack for telling half-truths, or half-lies; you pick. But the truth is out there, and Obama is banking on the majority of voters not doing the extra work to educate themselves. Richard Henry Lee writes a piece with a wealth of information on Ayers, Obama, and their work in the Woods Fund of Chicago. Read it HERE

Who are said these quotes?

Who are said these quotes?

A. “…our individual salvation depends on collective salvation. Because thinking only about yourself, fulfilling your immediate wants and needs, betrays a poverty of ambition.”

B. “Our nation can achieve permanent health only from within on the basis of the principle: The common interest before self-interest.”

(A. Obama B. Hitler)

Monday, October 13, 2008

Play this CNN, CBS, NBC!

Barack Obama told a crowd in Elko, Nevada "I want you to talk to them whether they are independent or whether they are Republican. I want you to argue with them and get in their face."

It seems they are listening to Obama's words...

Sunday, October 12, 2008

Liberal anger = empowerment...Conservative anger = racism

For most of the last eight years, we have heard liberals compare George W. Bush to Hitler, patriotic citizens of the U.S. as being "nationalistic Nazi-like", as well as telling our kids that their parents are "killing the planet". These are the friendlier comments! Visit a so-called "peace rally" and you will see signs that read, "A dead soldier is a good soldier", or signs that praise those who terrorize, and effigies of our leaders burning, along with our flag. But the big news outlets won't describe this scene as hate, but rather "citizens voicing their opinion". They excuse the violent words of liberals as people with a passion, expressing their voice.

The past few weeks the media has been exposed to a new "angry kid on the block"- and they're not yelling hate speech at our country, nor our president. But they are angry, and a bit concerned. They are angry that Barak Obama passes blame to the Bush Administration for this economic crisis, because they know Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are at the root cause of this. And they know that the Democrats stood on party lines to vote against putting regulations on this broken system years ago. They are angry. They know that people like Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, and Barak Obama have done nothing but receive money and votes for being buddies with the ones involved at the root of this crisis. Had the Democrats, including Barak Obama, supported John McCain and the Republicans years ago, we probably wouldn't be talking about economic crisis today. Oh, they are angry. They are concerned that a man who has regularly partnered with, worked for, and are supported by people who proudly and openly hate everything that America stands for. You better believe they are angry at the fact that a man named Barak Obama, who claims to stand for "hope and change" would be put in charge of a board (Annenberg Challenge) with a $50 million grant by an admitted, and unrepentant terrorist named Bill Ayers. This is a man, Ayers, who actually has something in common with the terrorists we are fighting against, Al Quida, in that they both were involved in bombing the Pentagon. So how can we, as Americans, put a lick of faith in a man like Barak Obama, who says he will protect us against terrorism, yet he takes money from, works with, and has support from a terrorist? .

Usually Republicans and/or conservatives stay quiet, turn one cheek and go on with our business. Let's face it, it is rare that you will see an angry mob of Republicans burning an effigy of Bill and Hillary Clinton at the Mall in Washington, D.C. (yeah right!). I was watching one of the mainstream news outlets as they reported Republican anger and excitement as hate and racism. Racist slurs have no place in election rallies. But racists of all types do indeed show up at rallies- its a free country. There are no "racist detectors" or radar that I know of- yet! But the media was not reporting Democrat and liberal rallies as being hateful when they were angry with George W. Bush or Republicans. I lived in Baltimore City, and believe me, I witnessed anti-white racism on a daily basis, as well as political rallies. Was it on the news? Of course not. It clearly is a double standard- as usual.

Why would much of the media report it this way? They clearly are not comfortable with conservatives expressing their opinions in the same way liberals do. It doesn't fit their overall agenda; that being, aiding in the election of Barak Obama. When over 90% of the people who work within the news media support Barak Obama, and Democrats in general, what else should we expect? Oh yeah, I guess we should expect un-biased news reporting without additional descriptive words to elevate the story to something that it really is not. It is a fact that there have been people posing as supporters at rallies acting out in negative ways just to get a story out there in the media. Think about it. Instead of an excited and empowered McCain rally, we have "a rally with angry people yelling hate". Kind of sounds like every other liberal supported rally that happens on every college campus in "Everytown, USA". Go figure.

Why don't they ever describe these people as angry and hateful?

Thursday, October 9, 2008

Acorn = Fraud

Here's a very revealing story about what many already suspected about ACORN. Keep in mind that when we hear about "community service" from Barak Obama- ACORN fits into his resume. In fact, Barak Obama, as a lawyer, represented ACORN. See how things are fitting together? Here is the article...

Monday, October 6, 2008

N.O.W. Los Angeles President endorses PALIN/McCain!

In a groundbreaking endorsment decision...
NOW L.A. President Shelly Mandel endorses Sarah Palin/John McCain saying, "This Is What A Feminist Looks Like".

Saturday, October 4, 2008

Obama is a fraud. If you vote for him, what does that make you?

The "legend in his own mind" and his buddies in action...

Friday, October 3, 2008


If you are one of those unsure voters, or have one of those friends who are not sure who they are going to vote for this election, then watch this video and send it to your friends. It is a bit fast paced, but watch it to the end, it is something many of us have known already, but to see it all wrapped up sends chills down my spine (and not the good chills that Chris Mathews talks about). It is about 10 minutes, so make sure you can watch it in one sitting.

Tuesday, September 30, 2008

Obama: Slum lord's friend.

Democrats Defending Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac in 2004

John McCain warned "they are deeply in need of reform"

Credit to The Travis Monitor blog for info gathering...
Here are the facts:
John McCain cosponsored the Federal Housing Enterprise Regulatory Reform Act of 2005. It doesn't get any clearer then this one. John McCain and his Republican co-sponsors saw a problem and Democrats, including Barack Obama, killed this bill.
"If Congress does not act, American taxpayers will continue to be exposed to the enormous risk that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac pose to the housing market, the overall financial system, and the economy as a whole." - John McCain, May 25 2006

The Obama Campaign Connection- Barack Obama has been advised in his Presidential bid by two ex-Fannie Mae CEOs, both having left in scandal. In the case of Raines, it was reported in 2004: "Although Fannie Mae chief Franklin Raines was fired for bungling its books, he’ll get a $26 million parachute — not counting a monthly pension of $116,300 for life. The 55-year-old Washington, D.C. insider and his CFO J. Timothy Howard left their jobs last week under a cloud of suspicion that the execs undermined the financial soundness of Fannie Mae, creating losses of up to $9 billion." NY Post, Dec 28, 2004

Obama said and did nothing to point out the malfeasance of these Obama supporters and advisors, and he's had the intention of leaning on these men who created this mess to somehow advise him on how to fix it.

Obama and Jack Reed (D) of RI held up any serious reform of Fannie Mae in order to cut out a “low income trust fund” that Fannie had to pay money into to offer loans to bad credit risks. The NILCH (National Institute for low income housing) had a press release that featured Reed and Obama talking about what a wonderful program that was, in May of this year. They were buying votes with Fannie Mae all the while McCain was calling for divestiture of some loans in order to shore up Capital Reserves.

Barney Frank- Obama was not the only Democrat in the tank for Fannie Mae: ‘’These two entities — Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac — are not facing any kind of financial crisis,’’ said Representative Barney Frank of Massachusetts, the ranking Democrat on the Financial Services Committee. ‘’The more people exaggerate these problems, the more pressure there is on these companies, the less we will see in terms of affordable housing.’’

Credit to The Travis Monitor

Monday, September 29, 2008

McCain: Working Obama: Stumping

If you would like to see what the major difference between Presidential candidates, John McCain and Barack Obama, just look at what they this Monday. John McCain is working for The People and Barack Obama is "throwing stones" and reading teleprompters...what's new?

Sunday, September 28, 2008

Bill Clinton: Democrats resisted to put standards on Fannie Mae/Mac

Bill Clinton- "I think the responsibility that the Democrats have may rest more in resisting any efforts by Republicans in the Congress, or by me when I was President, to put some standards and tighten up a little on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac."

Saturday, September 27, 2008

Iranians mock Holocaust...what's new?

On Friday (9/27) Iranians gathered, chanting "Death to Israel". The gathering was in support of a book mocking the Holocaust that Islamist students unveiled to the public.

In Gaza City, the Islamist Hamas that has ruled over the Palestinian territory since June 2007 called for more suicide attacks on Israel. The book was released titled "Holocaust", contains cartoons and sarcastic writings related to the Jewish Holocaust.

The cover illustration is of a Jew with a crooked nose and dressed in traditional garb drawing outlines of dead bodies on the ground. Inside, bearded Jews are shown leaving and re-entering a gas chamber with a counter that reads the number 5,999,999.

Remember this- Iran does not recognise the Jewish state, and President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has attracted international condemnation by repeatedly predicting Israel is doomed to disappear and branding the Holocaust a "myth."

This is the man, and country that Barack Obama has alluded to appeasment towards. Obama, when challenged on this, always backtracks on the issue in defense, but his words and actions give us a vision for a very dangerous foreign policy- and a slap in the face of the Jewish people.

Thursday, September 25, 2008

It's Clear...

McCain wants to work together for the good of the country.

Obama wants to debate the issue...for Obama.

Sunday, September 21, 2008

Liberal Hate

We shouldn't really be surprised about all the hateful and vile comments toward Sarah Palin that are coming out of the mouths of many Democrats and left-wing nuts. These comments are rooted in something pure and simple: hate. These are the same people who have claimed ownership over words such as "love", "awareness", "open minds", and "hate sucks". Where are all the conservative celebrities making hateful comments about Obama and Biden? Where are the Christians interrupting speeches at Universities so that the liberal speaker has to stop the event? They are at home taking care of family, working hard at their jobs, and in their communities bringing people together rather then dividing. The Democrats are not the party of my grandparents' generation. The Democratic Party have been hijacked by the likes of the MoveOns, DailyKos, and Michael Moores of the world. They no longer represent the will of the country and its people, but rather a fringe left that engages in hate.

This is who drives the Democrat leaders...do you want these people influencing the future of your children?

Saturday, September 13, 2008

Barack Obama and his Willfully Ignorant Supporters

At the start of his campaign, Barack Obama promised that he was a different politician, one who would not sink to personal attacks and dirty politics. Unless you lived in Chicago, you may not have known that in actuality, Barack Obama's political strategies have all been "thug politics", a man who would rather clear the playing field rather then risk defeat and face his opponents.

Barack Obama's political history is chock full of dirty and mean spirited political strategy- you just have to look into his history. This is not about Republicans taking shots at Obama's record, but rather shining the light on the facts. The facts do show that Obama played a very different game of politics then he likes to appear to be. Like Prego spaghetti sauce commercials say, "Its in there!". You just have to pry open the gate the mainstream media has put up. Because if Obama's dreamy followers knew this information when they were deciding what candidate to throw their early support to, they would never have supported a man with Obama's past behavior. In fact, Barack Obama is like a caricature of the "dirty politician" who gives you a check for $100 while his people are taking your wallet out of your back pocket. And then he riles you up to "fight the man" for bringing you down. But why do his faithful followers stay faithful? Are they actually that ignorant? Or do they just log onto Obama's website and take everything his campaign says as fact? I believe most people are willfully ignorant. That is, I believe that Obama's followers invensted so much of themselves early in the campaign without vetting this man, that their pride won't let them step out and say, "I was wrong, I'm not going to throw my country away because of my mistake in judgment".

I am going to pose a little scenario. Knowing the pride that people can take when talking about their political views, I realize there are people, when asked who they are supporting this election, will say they are voting for Obama. These are people who have liberal friends, work with liberals, and know that if they even alluded to voting for McCain, they would be lampooned and/or have their character "crucified" in the midst of their social circle. But deep down, they don't feel good or right about pulling the lever for Obama. These people may even resent Obama for preying on their emotions to lure them in for their vote and now the facts show this man to be the opposite of the "new politician". So when these people who feel failed by their Democratic Party, who feel used by the Obama campaign, but can't bring themselves to admit this to their liberal friends and associates, they will go into that voting booth in November and not vote for Obama, but vote for John McCain.

These are the people that the polls will not, and cannot account for. But they are out there. If you are one of these people, I salute you for standing up for what is right for our country and voting your conscience. God Bless America!

Friday, September 12, 2008

Real Change

We have heard the Obama campaign throw the word change around, and even act like they own the word. But nothing in Obama actions nor work have shown to bring positive change- just look at his old stomping grounds in Chicago. The brave men and woman who have been fighting and rebuilding Iraq, have been bringing change- from a bloody thirsty dicator to a country were its citizen can have freedoms, and even vote. Here is a video posted by a brave soldier with a message to Obama...

Thursday, September 11, 2008

In Memory...9-11-01

Evan Coyne Maloney, who heads up the >bt: brain terminal blog, has a tribute to the victims of the 9-11 terrorist attacks...Here is the LINK

Tuesday, September 9, 2008


Strong. Powerful. Respectful. Intelligent. Proven. Determined. Compassionate. Birth. Mother. Wife. Governor.

Out of the 11 words above, there is one word that that truly sets woman apart (and on a pedestal in my opinion) from men. That word is "birth". It comes down to basic biology. Woman, putting medical issues aside, can give birth to a new human life. The absolute miracle of life. Sure, men have something to do with that, but overall, woman have something that no man will ever be able to carry out- pregnancy. Now put aside all the freaks of science that may pop up on the news, naturally speaking, men can not take on the ultimate miracle called birth. And it is this one thing that woman have, and can achieve, only because of their sex, that the so called "modern woman's movement' has spent more time trying to fight against. Let's face it, every single human being on this earth came into this earth via a mother. Talk about an important role, and feminists everywhere mock this role every chance they get.

Groups such as the National Organization of Woman (NOW) has spent more time fighting and celebrating their freedom to kill the life that grows in their womb, then celebrating those who bring life into the world- the mother. Organizations such as NOW have never been more hypocritical and truly anti-womanhood then as of late. Enter Sarah Palin. She represents everything that is a woman. She can, and has, done it all. She has taken on the man's world, and then some. But she also has experienced and lived out what truly separates woman from men. She has given birth. Now this is not to say that woman who cannot become pregnant or use birth control are somehow less of a woman. But liberal woman who are pro-abortion have hijacked the "woman's movement" way too long. I know more woman who strive for what Sarah Palin strives for then the NOW movement. In fact some could argue that groups such as NOW are aiding in the destruction of womanhood. NOW supporters who march in the name of the right to abort babies are celebrating the death of many future woman. How many woman would have been alive today being a service to our society had they not been shredded to their deaths at the hands of abortionists. This is a fact. A fact that NOW won't ever admit.

NOW have failed miserably to fight for the most defensless of all woman- those who are on the other side of the womb wall. That is why NOW is an archaic form of woman's rights. Gov. Sarah Palin doesn't just represent one group of woman, but ALL woman- old, young, and even those awaiting birth into this world. One could even say that her brand of feminism is open to all woman, not just "those with a VIP pass signed by Gloria Steinem".

Wednesday, September 3, 2008

Liberals, Democrats in obvious PANIC!!!

Turn on the TV to NBC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC and you will witness the press in a panic. The biased coverage in favor of Obama the past few weeks has reached a boil this week as coverage of the Republican National Convention has become a Sarah Palin stone throwing fest. News organizations used to at least put some effort into delivering the news without personal opionion shining through. But watching or reading the news has become something of a chore for those who make a point at thinking for themselves. It appears that The New York Times has officially become the "New York Opinion" with a small news section on the back page.

Liberal commentators truly believe that there is only one way, and that is the Obama way. Whether or not Obama is qualified, or what sketchy background he has, he is the "annointed one". And to challenge his qualifications, or lack there of, is comparable to walking into Sunday Mass and dissing the Pope. But there is something the media can't hide forever, and that is truth. And truth WILL rise from the ashes after they try burning down the house of McCain/Palin. And when the truth does rise, the only one with ash and soot on their faces will be Obama, his followers, and the biased hate mongering media.

Tuesday, September 2, 2008

Obama's $65 Billion-a-year "Global Tax" proposal!!

Jonathon Moseley of Accuracy in the Media, writes a story about a bill Barack Obama introduced (S.2433) called the "Global Poverty Act" in 2007. Joe Biden pushed it through his committee as chairmen of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee without any hearings. This bill is not what it appears to be and the Obama media machine is doing a big old fashioned cover up. Here's a snippet:

"Obama’s Global Poverty Act is in fact a stunning and sweeping step toward socialism and one-world government. When we look beyond the seductive title, and read the actual contents, we discover that Obama and Biden are setting America up for imposition of a global tax, controlled by the United Nations. For the first time, the U.S. could be forced to adopt a global tax at the behest of an international body. The planned amount is 0.7% of America’s Gross National Product (GNP) or $65 billion per year, in addition to America’s current foreign aid budget."
Here is the entire article

Monday, September 1, 2008

Anti-War (and violent)

I always find anti-war protesters to be ironic and to be hypocrites. Look at our "peace seeking" protesters in St. Paul this week...

Friday, August 29, 2008

Gov. Sarah Palin - And she's got more experience than Obama!

It has finally happened- The Republicans are on fire! McCain lived up to his reputation as a maverick, but not in going against his party, but in moving the GOP to a new era. The Obama campaign are reacted with a desperate sounding press release that will end up back firing on them by insinuating that Gov. Sara Palin somehow didn't have the experience needed. Of course she has more experience then Democrat Presidential nominee Obama, who has spent most of his time as Senator campaigning. More to come...

Thursday, August 28, 2008

Obama & Brittney DO have something in common...

They have the same stage designer! Truth is stranger then fiction. Sometimes the DNC makes it too easy for us. We couldn't make this stuff up better ourselves.
"We've done Britney's sets and a whole bunch of rock shows, but this was far more elaborate and complicated and we had to do it in far less time," said Allen, of RDA Entertainment.
More here...

Obama campaign attmepts to CENSOR- again.

It is disturbing to watch how the Obama campaign attempts to bully and censor anyone who shines light on Obama's sketchy past- even when there are facts to back it up.
Story HERE...

Tuesday, August 26, 2008

Obama- In the business of CENSORSHIP

It appears that the Obama campaign is in the business of censorship. We've already heard Democratic Presidential nominee Barack Obama share his views on how we should be more like China, a country who openly engages in censorship, government control of the media, and has prisons (and graves) filled with those who won't comply (and poor environmental regulations, working force working for peanuts, human rights violations, etc). Apparently Obama is somehow "above" being criticized with political ads based on fact. A new ad that poses the question of Obama's relationship with admitted terrorist William Ayers. The facts is, they did have a relationship, and we as American voters should question why a man running for the highest office would befriend a man who was responsible for terrorist acts on our own soil. William Ayers, not only admitted doing these acts, but even went further in saying that he didn't do enough. The Obama campaign is threatening legal action for any stations playing this ad. They are obviously desperate. Desperate people react in desperate ways. The Obama campaign knows that these facts could, and should, destroy Obama's presidential aspirations; because there is no good reason for an American president to be in the same friendly social circle as a terrorist like Ayers. So the only way the Obama campaign can get around this hurdle is to cast out the word lie, and use government to "turn off the microphone". Sounds familiar? Pelosi did the same thing when members of congress wanted to debate the energy issues this past month. We are getting a preview of what an Obama presidency along with a Pelosi run congress could be like...hey, a lot like China. We must sit down, shut up, and work for the common cause- even if we don't buy it...ouch. Oh, here is the ad that has Obama and his cult very nervous...

Monday, August 25, 2008

Obama's running mate favors McCain...

Past words speak louder then present day's actions. Joe Biden seems to agree that Obama doesn't have the experience needed to be President. He even said that he would be "honored to run with, or against John McCain because the country would be better off". I couldn't make this stuff up if I tried. Watch for yourself...

And the Clintons don't either...

Friday, August 22, 2008

Obama and the New Liberal Fascists (Part 1)

I remember being a college student in the early to mid 90's. In my freshman year Bill Clinton was sworn into office and so began the decade of political correctness. Men stopped opening doors for women, for fear of offending feminists since they "didn't need a man's help". I came to find out that most woman really did enjoy having doors opened for them; even the liberal ones- go figure. Language could take on new offensive meanings, depending on who was in the room, where you were, and who you were. I came to learn that being liberal was anything but liberating. It was like walking on glass, constantly waiting to be called a racist, bigot, or "culturally unaware" for just being a conservative. I was an artist in the art department of a major university and instead of being in an environment where ideas were openly and freely shared, there was a dark cloud of self censorship hanging over me. Professors and instructors openly spoke of their Marxist, socialist views, but one hint of any of their students having a point of view that differed from theirs and grades were at stake. And even if grades were not affected, there was a mob mentality that arose which quickly sent any students who didn't "comply" back into their closet. I found that this wasn't only happening in the art department, but most of the liberal arts departments (hence the name I guess). Usually the atmosphere created by professors and other liberal students seemed tame at first. A sarcastic comment here, forced reading material or film assignments there. Eventually there would be the situation where a few students, led by the professor, picked apart , not a student's aesthetics such as use of color, but their actual being; their beliefs, opinions- their politics. Welcome to Liberal Fascism 101. We have to remember that fascists empower themselves by creating a situation, culture, society, that demonize the opposing viewpoint. And if enough people can buy into the lie, that lie being that opposing views are ignorant, racist, or evil, then the fascist gains power through the people who have fallen for their mirage. And then "the people" who conform to the fascists ideas will gang up on those individuals who express their own different viewpoints. I didn't realize it when I was a student in college, but I was experiencing fascism on a micro level. This is similar to what has happened with the "cult of Obama". Those who are critical of Obama are thrown the "race card", called "mean spiritied", or just put into the "unawareness" category. Even the comedians won't joke about that guy too much for fear of being called the big "R" word- "I can't believe he said that about our Barry Obama, he must be a...RACIST". (to be continued...)

Thursday, August 21, 2008

Democrats Disgusting Racist Past

The world will see the Democrats put on a show in Denver at the 2008 Democratic National Convention. As their "messiah", Sen. Barack Obama, stand on stage in front of thousands of people gathered in the stadium, hoping to make history with a new speech on the anniversery of Martin Luther King, Jr.'s famous "I have a dream" speech, there won't be any talk about the Democrat Party's racist past (nor present). The DNC website, in fact, has a "Party History" section which happens to be "detoxified" of their racist roots. The Wall Street Journal's Jeffrey Lord writes a telling piece here.

So during the DNC convention, as they try to take ownership of civil rights, remember- Martin Luther King, Jr. was a Republican...

"The Democrats' Missing History"