Friday, October 31, 2008
We can tell a lot about people by the way they treat their own family members. In San Francisco, anti-war activist Cindy Sheehan is running against Nancy Pelosi for her congressional position. Sheehan has been a long time critic of Pelosi and her position on the war (I guess she wasn't against the war enough?). People like Nancy Pelosi are not used to having people protest against them because usually they have the protestors on their side. But Sheehan and her gang of protesters were a real thorn in Pelosi's side. Now Sheehan is running for her job! Apparently there are some people who are not too happy about this because Cindy Sheehan has been the victim of some "intimidation" tactics, the most recent was this past week, October 30, 2008. All the front windows of her campaign office were broken out and a computer was stolen.
Sheehan's campaign manager, Tiffany Burns says, "Each time we confront her (Pelosi), each time we ask her for a debate, each time we gain ground in the polls, something horrible happens," said Burns. "Once or twice might be a coincidence, but such a consistent correlation is hard to ignore."
- For a campaign and media that loves to look deep into the lives of average citizens like "Joe the Plumber", they don't seem too concerned with Obama's past. Aside from his obviously sketchy circle of friends and colleagues, his records are still a mystery. Maybe if Obama was a white, conservative, and/or Republican these records would be demanded by the media.
- 1. Occidental College records -- Not released
- 2. Columbia College records -- Not released
- 3. Columbia Thesis paper -- 'not available'
- 4. Harvard College records -- Not released
- 5. Selective Service Registrati
on -- Not released
- 6. Medical records -- Not released (we have a "excellent health" letter from his doctor...yeah.)
- 7. Illinois State Senate schedule -- 'not available'
- 8. Law practice client list -- Not released
- 9. Certified Copy of original Birth certificat
e - - Not released
- 10. Embossed, signed paper Certificat
ion of Live Birth -- Not released
- 11. Harvard Law Review articles published -- None
- 12. University of Chicago scholarly articles -- None
- 13. Record of baptism-- Not released or 'not available'
14. Illinois State Senate records--'
Wednesday, October 22, 2008
Recently we have witnessed Barack Obama and his campaign be on the defensive after John McCain called Obama's tax plan a socialist plan. But when we look at what makes up the man who is Barack Obama, we see a vast array of socialist and communist writers, community leaders, and even mentors, that Obama immersed himself in. In his book Dreams From My Father, Barack wrote, "I chose my friends carefully. The more politically active black students. The foreign students. The Chicanos. The Marxist professors and structural feminists and punk-rock performance poets.”
Frank Marshall Davis, a communist, and member of the Communist Party USA (CPUSA) was a childhood mentor to Obama. He even writes about him in Dreams From My Father, referring to him repeatedly as "Frank". So it would be natural for a college bound Obama to associate himself with the young socialists and Marxists on campus.
For someone who places their "community organizer" status so high, high enough that they use it as a reason to be President of the free world, we sure don't hear much about the details of the actual "organizing". While journalists were trying to track down a non-existent wrench to throw into Sarah Palin's "wheels", there is so much dirt in Chicago surrounding Barack Obama's "community organizing" days that one would only have to do an internet search or read up on some newspaper archives to find out the facts. But ignorance is bliss in the mainstream media when you are an Obama supporter. We are not hearing much about the details because the majority of the media knows what they will find, and it doesn't further their cause- an Obama presidency.
But it was in Chicago that Obama came in contact with some of the most left-wing political groups in our country. These groups were/are pushing for socialist programs cloaked in "community organizing". Here we find groups such as ACORN, Bill Ayers, and Carl Davidson. ACORN has a dismal record for voter registration fraud.
Bill Ayers is an unrepentant terrorist, and Weather Underground founder (and open Marxist). Ayers served with Obama on the Woods Fund of Chicago as well as the Annenberg Challenge. Bill Ayers also launched Obama's political career with a fundraiser in his own living room. Obama's argument is that he was a child when Ayers took part in these terrorist activities. But that is not the point. The point is that he would associate with someone who is still, in 2001 when they still had worked together, was unrepentant. But the bigger issue is this: Ayers has shown Obama great support, and vice versa. Does Obama share his views? If not, why would you spend that time of time and work with someone that far out? Based on that relation alone, Barack Obama wouldn't pass a security screen for many other high level government jobs. (Makes you wonder doesn't it?)
Carl Davidson is a figure in the Correspondence for Democracy and Socialism, which stems from the old Moscow controlled CPUSA. He helped organize the 2002 rally where Barack Obama came out against the Iraq War. Davidson is a member of the New Party, a Marxist political coalition. Obama sought out their endorsment for his Illinois senate seat in 1996- and he got it.
And then we have his church, where he attended for over twenty years. A church that preaches openly, Black Liberation Theology. His "spiritual mentor, as Obama referred to him, was the Rev. Jeremiah Wright. Wright preached socialist, Marxist/Maoist, and anti-Jew and anti-white sermons; hate speech. The question here again, why would Obama spend two decades with a man, and church who has such divisive, and racist views? To be baptized in, married in, and raise children in such an environment would tell of a man who agrees with this racist philosophy. It wasn't until the media outlets finally ran the story that Obama finally quit the church. Why now Obama? He obviously had no problem with those views the last two decades; very troubling indeed.
Barack Obama either has really bad judgement of who he surrounds himself with, or, he actually does think the same way as these people and groups. We probably can come to the conclusion that Obama was mentored by, worked with, and befriended these people because he does indeed share their philosophies. Remember that quote from Obama, "I chose my friends carefully"? It appears that he did continue on that path. But when he began running for President of the United States, he knew he would not be able to be elected if he openly campaigned as a Marxist or Socialist. He has learned well from the writings of Marxist activist Saul Alinsky who wrote the "bible for radicals", Rules for Radicals. Even Saul Alinsky's son remarked that "Obama learned his lesson well." One of those lessons was to "rub raw the sores of discontent", as Saul Alinsky put it. In other words, remind the people how angry they should be, even when they are not. Because when they are angry, Barack can be "the One" to come to their rescue (or that's what he tells them). That's what Obama did in Chicago, and that is what Obama is doing today.
So this brings us back to Barack Obama and his campaign acting surprised and offended that McCain and his supporters would insinuate that his policies were dripping with socialism. Where would we get that idea from(sarcasm)? Does Obama, his campaign, and the majority of the media think "We the People" are that dumb? Apparently they do. And it appears that Barack Obama has pulled the wool over the eyes of many. But we live in an age where information travels faster then ever. The media bigwigs don't have control over the world wide web, the bloggers, the e-mails- not yet. But that's another story ("Fairness Doctrine")....
Tuesday, October 21, 2008
Back in the 2004 Presidential Election, children's programming channel Nickelodeon released a poll results that had Democratic hopeful John Kerry winning the election over Republican George W. Bush. The results less then two weeks away from the election according to their online poll showed that 57% backed Kerry against 43% for Bush! In this article, released on October 21, 2004, it discusses how the "kids' vote seems to work as a good barometer of the actual presidential vote". Well, apparently the kids must have changed their mind at the time of the actual election because those numbers were not only wrong, but as we know now, Bush won the election.
So what does this have to do with the election in 2008? Well, Nickelodeon released the same poll between Obama and McCain. The numbers are a bit closer with Obama leading McCain 51% to 49%. According to the 2004 results, these numbers could translate to, McCain beating Obama, 56.7% to 42.3%! Interestingly enough, this really wouldn't be that far fetched. Take for instance, the margin of error, along with undecided voters, and you have an entirely different kind of election then the mainstream media has been presenting to us.
So with that said, this election is far from being wrapped up!
Thursday, October 16, 2008
It seems when Barack Obama visited Kenya on a "fact-finding" trip in 2006, he was carrying out part of a secret election strategy that also included exploiting divisive tribal tensions and ultimately taking advantage of rioting that left 1,000 dead. Read Story...
Wednesday, October 15, 2008
Who are said these quotes?
A. “…our individual salvation depends on collective salvation. Because thinking only about yourself, fulfilling your immediate wants and needs, betrays a poverty of ambition.”
B. “Our nation can achieve permanent health only from within on the basis of the principle: The common interest before self-interest.”
(A. Obama B. Hitler)
Monday, October 13, 2008
Sunday, October 12, 2008
The past few weeks the media has been exposed to a new "angry kid on the block"- and they're not yelling hate speech at our country, nor our president. But they are angry, and a bit concerned. They are angry that Barak Obama passes blame to the Bush Administration for this economic crisis, because they know Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are at the root cause of this. And they know that the Democrats stood on party lines to vote against putting regulations on this broken system years ago. They are angry. They know that people like Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, and Barak Obama have done nothing but receive money and votes for being buddies with the ones involved at the root of this crisis. Had the Democrats, including Barak Obama, supported John McCain and the Republicans years ago, we probably wouldn't be talking about economic crisis today. Oh, they are angry. They are concerned that a man who has regularly partnered with, worked for, and are supported by people who proudly and openly hate everything that America stands for. You better believe they are angry at the fact that a man named Barak Obama, who claims to stand for "hope and change" would be put in charge of a board (Annenberg Challenge) with a $50 million grant by an admitted, and unrepentant terrorist named Bill Ayers. This is a man, Ayers, who actually has something in common with the terrorists we are fighting against, Al Quida, in that they both were involved in bombing the Pentagon. So how can we, as Americans, put a lick of faith in a man like Barak Obama, who says he will protect us against terrorism, yet he takes money from, works with, and has support from a terrorist? .
Usually Republicans and/or conservatives stay quiet, turn one cheek and go on with our business. Let's face it, it is rare that you will see an angry mob of Republicans burning an effigy of Bill and Hillary Clinton at the Mall in Washington, D.C. (yeah right!). I was watching one of the mainstream news outlets as they reported Republican anger and excitement as hate and racism. Racist slurs have no place in election rallies. But racists of all types do indeed show up at rallies- its a free country. There are no "racist detectors" or radar that I know of- yet! But the media was not reporting Democrat and liberal rallies as being hateful when they were angry with George W. Bush or Republicans. I lived in Baltimore City, and believe me, I witnessed anti-white racism on a daily basis, as well as political rallies. Was it on the news? Of course not. It clearly is a double standard- as usual.
Why would much of the media report it this way? They clearly are not comfortable with conservatives expressing their opinions in the same way liberals do. It doesn't fit their overall agenda; that being, aiding in the election of Barak Obama. When over 90% of the people who work within the news media support Barak Obama, and Democrats in general, what else should we expect? Oh yeah, I guess we should expect un-biased news reporting without additional descriptive words to elevate the story to something that it really is not. It is a fact that there have been people posing as supporters at rallies acting out in negative ways just to get a story out there in the media. Think about it. Instead of an excited and empowered McCain rally, we have "a rally with angry people yelling hate". Kind of sounds like every other liberal supported rally that happens on every college campus in "Everytown, USA". Go figure.
Why don't they ever describe these people as angry and hateful?
Thursday, October 9, 2008
Here's a very revealing story about what many already suspected about ACORN. Keep in mind that when we hear about "community service" from Barak Obama- ACORN fits into his resume. In fact, Barak Obama, as a lawyer, represented ACORN. See how things are fitting together? Here is the article...
Monday, October 6, 2008
NOW L.A. President Shelly Mandel endorses Sarah Palin/John McCain saying, "This Is What A Feminist Looks Like".